“Imagining (the Future) Business: How to Make Firms with Plans?” In Imagining Business. “Cents and Sensibility: Economic Valuation and the Nature of Nature’.” American Journal of Sociology 116(6): 1721–1777. “Manufacturing Shareholder Value: The Role of Accounting in Organizational Transformation.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 33(2–3): 107–140. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Įzzamel, Mahmoud, Hugh Willmott, and Frank Worthington.
The Struggle for Water: Politics, Rationality, and Identity in the American Southwest. Value Practices in the Life Sciences and Medicine. DOI: 10.1093/scipol/sct033ĭussauge, Isabelle, Claes-Fredrik Helgesson, and Francis Lee, eds. “Transfer and Exploration: Two Models of Science-Industry Intermediation.” Science and Public Policy 40(4): 442–452. “Introduction: Special issue on Sociology of Valuation and Evaluation.” Human Sciences 38(1): 1–12. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150129Ĭefai, Danile, Martin Endress, Stefan Nicolae, and Bénédicte Zimmermann. “The Sociology of Finance.” Annual Review of Sociology 37: 239–259. DOI: 10.1068/d343tĬarruthers, Bruce G., and Jeong-Chul Kim. “On Qualculation, Agency, and Otherness.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 23(5): 717–733. “Accounting in its Social Context: Towards a History of Value Added in the United Kingdom.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 10(4): 381–413. Moments of Valuation: Exploring Sites of Dissonance. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpa.2011.03.001īerthoin Antal, Ariane, Michael Hutter, and David Stark, eds. “Framing Financial Responsibility: An Analysis of the Limitations of Accounting.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 22(6): 593–607. The study contributes to literature that theorizes the conditions underlying evaluators’ mediation of the multiple registers of value at work in the making of markets.īay, Charlotta.
These experimenters extended judgment devices from mainstream finance to construct calculative tools in this setting that permitted the social or environmental value of investments to be brought into being and to be made calculable for investors without being assigned a financial value. I frame the market of impact investing as a case of market design complete with experiments, one in which advocates produced a valuation infrastructure so as to address investors’ difficulty in ascertaining the social and environmental value - as a distinct regime of value from financial value - of an investment. Drawing from the pragmatist turn in valuation studies, this article attends to the valuation work that took place in the formation of this new market, examining how market proponents as evaluators recognized, defined, and negotiated the presence of value complexity in impact investing. Impact investing-investment with the intentional expectation of social or environmental impact alongside financial return-constitutes one of a growing array of “concerned markets” where economic exchange is employed as a means to pursue financial and social or environmental value.
0 kommentar(er)
